יום שבת, 22 בספטמבר 2012

Where Does It Take Us? The Security Scenario

To complete my theory of the inability of the Jews to maintain their own state over time, I shall try to predict the end of the Jewish state.

As said in previous posts, the damage was done by the tendency that is burnt deeply into the Jewish communal culture to ignore and break rules and limits of any kind and go to the end and beyond it in defending the survival of Judaism and the victory over its enemies.

Life without law and without limits, do not allow for reasonable government systems to function. It defies the ability of management the state and brings chaos to the country's society and severely undermines the connection between the citizens and their state.

Take for example the military and security establishment. Obviously, if this system had weakened considerably, the Arab states that surround us would not hesitate to attack and occupy the country. Yet this military system has long forgotten this simple fact. It is disconnected from the rest of the governing systems. It detached itself from any external supervision. It is not subject to any monitoring of its budget and manages its own life. Accordance with the common trends in the Israeli society, the security personnel take care, first of all, of padding themselves with generous budgets and try to improve their own benefits and put it beyond the importance of any other purpose. The top security system commanders have become very political and the progress in the ranking hierarchy is not related to the professional capabilities, but to the elbowing and manipulation capabilities. Some of these generals have recently joint the political system. Once they step out of the security system, they are exposed as medium level or lower type of politicians. Ehud Barak, Mofaz, Matan Vilnai, Dichter, Dan Halutz, Diskin, Ya'alon and Gabi Ashkenazi. Yossi Sarid recently called them in his column: "dummies". In fact, they are probably not stupid people, but they seem to be people without any backbone or compass. They are desperately trying to be popular by doing excessive and ridiculous use of the common clichés, without giving any hint for existence of opinion of their own. They are very strong, however, in throwing slime at anyone who opposes them.

In this sad reality of the military leadership, it is clear that people from the middle class and above, refrain from sending their children to combat units. Why would anyone want to risk his son, given the poor decision-making system exposed in the Second Lebanon War, for example? Nobody is too enthusiastic about chasing stone-throwers in the territories, either. Instead, the boys are sent to the computing and technical units, which keep growing in size. The boys acquire a good profession there and when they are released, they gladly join the top earners in the hi-tech market. Besides the computer units, there are many more home front units, like the speaker unit and other propaganda and media bodies. The combat units are filled by the peripheral populations: first - the settlers community, then the Russian immigrants, the kibbutz's and moshav's and the developed towns. Dr. Yagil Levy studied the subject and published the book "From The People's Army to The Peripheral Army". It did not get wide headlines in the media that makes sure to publish stable recruitment percentages in the big cities. For some reason they do not talk about the percentages of recruitment to the combat units.

This trend of the military detachment from the elite populations will surely bring a significant decline in motivation of the armed forces. The loyalty of the major supplier of quality personnel to the combat units - the settlers community and national-religious community, is loyal to "Judaism" and not to the state. Also, they do not come from a culture of courage and daring.

In addition to the above, the security and military systems are immune from criticism. The military experts and commentators, some coming from these systems, are not loyal to their profession as journalists, but rather to the object of their writing. The public also will not, mostly, want to hear a bad word about the security system. This prevents exposure of flaws and inefficiencies in the system.

In the coming years we will see a growing deterioration of the army's and its commanders capabilities. Perhaps at some point Israel will switch from compulsory army into a professional army, but such a move would only formalize the process that already happens in reality.

Hence, a scenario of the army, losing its deterrence against the Arab armies is not so far away.

In the following posts, two other catastrophe scenarios will be discussed: Economic collapse and disintegration of the society.

אין תגובות:

הוסף רשומת תגובה